We Proudly Accept

Welcome to Fightback Security Products!

My Cart:
0 item(s) - $0.00
You have no items in your shopping cart.

0

Fightback Security Products

www.fightbackgroup.com

  • San Marcos woman holds stalker with stun gun after waking up to him in her apartment

    San Marcos woman awoke to find a man crouched at the foot of her bed, then detained the man using a stun gun until police arrived, authorities said.

    Chaitanya Cherukuri, 24, was arrested and faces charges of burglary of a habitation, stalking and voyeurism.

    According to a news release from the City of San Marcos, the victim woke up in her apartment around 5:30 a.m. on Dec. 3 and found Cherukuri at the foot of her bed.

    "She grabbed a personal Taser and shouted for her roommate to call SMPD," the release said. "The victim held Cherukuri at Taser-point until officers arrived and detained him."

    The incident was allegedly the third time the woman had awoken to find Cherukuri in her apartment. Police discovered he had a key that matched the locks to the victim's apartment, officials said.

    Police believe he's broken into other homes in San Marcos as well.

    We carry a full line of personal tasers. See: http://www.fightbackgroup.com/taser.html

     

    Source: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/crime/article/Woman-wakes-to-find-alleged-stalker-crouched-at-12421542.php

  • Using Stun Guns for Personal Defense

    Stun guns are non-lethal weapons that are sometimes used as personal security devices for self-defense. These weapons use a high-voltage current that is activated by the user when an attacker or aggressive person is physically threatening the person with the stun gun.

    Stun guns generally have two contact points that are used to deliver the voltage to the attacker. In most stun guns, the contacts must be held in contact with the skin for at least a few seconds in order to produce a response in the attacker. Most stun guns on the market will also go through clothing and don’t have to be held against the attacker’s bare skin.

    When a stun gun is used for personal defense, the owner pushes a button to start the electric current when the attacker comes too close. Stun guns can be used to shock the attacker, causing a startled reaction that can give the stun gun owner a chance to get away from the attacker before any other aggressive actions are taken. In other cases, stun guns are used to cause a more dramatic reaction to the attacker.

    The severity of the reaction that a person has when shocked with a stun gun varies depending on the voltage of the device and the length of time that it’s held in contact with a person’s skin or clothing. It can also vary according to the amount of clothing that is between the stun gun and the attacker. Thicker clothing can mean a less severe reaction or one that takes much longer to be felt.

    When a stun gun is activated, the current passes from the stun gun and enters the body of the attacker, affecting the person’s nervous system. The voltage then enters the muscles, causing much of the reaction that is felt. A person who receives a shock from a stun gun will have an immediate muscle reaction. This reaction causes the body’s muscles to move rapidly, resulting in a gyrating, seizure-like reaction in the attacker. The more intense the shock, the more the muscles react and the harsher the reaction of the rest of the body.

    Being in contact with the stun gun’s voltage for several seconds will cause the attacker’s muscles to react violently enough to cause the body to use up its store of blood sugar. This is what causes the attacker to lose the ability to move. This involuntary lack of movement is where the name of the weapon gets its name. If the shock is more intense or lasts for a longer period of time, it can cause the assailant to lose consciousness.

    A shock, a stun or a loss of consciousness will not result in any permanent bodily damage for the attacker. The effects of coming into contact with the voltage generally only last for a few minutes or less. This brief reaction time gives the stun gun owner a chance to get away from a dangerous situation and get to safety.

    Find the stun gun that fits you at http://www.fightbackgroup.com/stun-guns.html

  • Pepper Spray Vs. Wasp Spray

    A Facebook post depicted how wasp spray is a superior substitute for pepper spray. I won't subject you to the pseudo-realities introduced in this article, in light of the fact that honestly it was all falsehood that doesn't and should not be reprinted twice.

    Wasp spray, for the record, ought to never be utilized as a substitute to OC or pepper spray. We should put this myth to rest with a few actualities on why wasp spray should remain in the pantry.

    “It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.” That piece of information is the very first sentence written under directions of use on the wasp spray cand. Prior even to the directions for use of this item, they need you to know that it is unlawful to utilize it for something besides the slaughtering of bugs.

    By intentionally conveying wasp spray as a self-protection instrument, you not only are putting yourself in threat (which we'll get to later) but on the other hand you're opening yourself up to some legitimate repercussions. You will have a hard time attempting to explain to the bad guy’s legal advisor why you were utilizing an item outside of its planned purposes when the can obviously states not to do so.

    Pepper, or OC, spray then again conveys a notice similar to this; “The use of this substance or device for any purpose other than self defense is a crime under the law.” Take note that pepper spray unequivocally names self-preservation as its proposed reason for use. Continue reading

  • Pepper Spray is Mightier than a Machete

    On December 2nd, in Tulsa, Okla., police report that a machete brandishing would be robber tried holding up a Cricket Wireless only to be met with an employee armed with pepper spray. The man retreated and was last seen leaving the store area on a bicycle and empty handed.

    Anyone with information should contact Crime Stoppers at 918-596-COPS.

  • Good News for New Jersey Residents

    New Jersey –-(Ammoland.com)- In a brief dated November 7, 2016, submitted in the Appellate case of State v. Lambert, the Office of the Attorney General concedes that New sm-lilguy-b_a_1_1_2_1_1Jersey’s Stun Gun Ban is unconstitutional, stating:

    “[T]he State agrees with defendant that New Jersey’s stun-gun statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-3h, is unconstitutional in light of Caetano v. Massachusetts, 136 S.Ct. 1027 (2016), and defendant’s conviction under that statute should be vacated in the interests of justice.” (See attached.)

    This position was in response to a brief filed on behalf of Appellant Lambert by Joshua Sanders, Esq., of the New Jersey Office of the Public Defender Appellate Division. (See attached.)

    In this case, Lambert was charged in 2009 with possession of a stun gun in violation of N.J.S. 2C:39-3h, as well as other non-weapons charges.

    Although the appellant did not raise this constitutional issue in his original 2015 plea, the Attorney General confirms in its brief:

    “[T]he State agrees with defendant’s reading of United States Supreme Court precedent. To briefly recap Second-Amendment jurisprudence, the United States Supreme Court held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 582 (2008), and that this “Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States[.]” McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 750 (2010).”

    The AG further recognizes:

    “The State is unaware of any legitimate basis to distinguish New Jersey’s stun-gun statute from Massachusetts’ statute. The New Jersey stun-gun statute, like the Massachusetts statute, criminalizes mere possession of a stun gun….. Since both statutes criminalize mere possession of a stun gun, for the reasons outlined in Caetano, New Jersey’s stun-gun statute, like Massachusetts’s statute, violates the Second Amendment.”

    Evan F. Nappen, Esq., whose practice focuses on firearm and weapons law, stated in response to this recent development, “This is going to help a lot of people, including those who are looking for a reliable, non-lethal form of defense.”

    Additionally, Nappen confirmed that he presently has a number of cases in which this will be of help.

    About:
    Evan Nappen (www.EvanNappen.com) is a criminal defense attorney who has focused on New Jersey firearms and weapons law for over 23 years. He is the author of the New Jersey Gun Law Guide. Visit his website at www.EvanNappen.com

  • Pepper Spray saved unknown number of lives

    John Meis saw a shooter on campus. He had already killed one person, shot at others, and when Meis saw him reloading, he grabbed his pepper spray and used it as it is intended to be used. We can't always carry a gun for self-defense. But you can carry your pepper spray almost anywhere. If you don't have it when you need it, it's like being bare naked in a snow storm - you'd give anything for it, but your life may be what you wind up giving. DON'T BE UNARMED - carry pepper spray! Continue reading

  • Store Manager Stops Robbery Using Peper Spray

    The story below happened recently in Ashland, KY two men tried robbing an Ashlon area Solon and the store manager stopped them in their tracks with pepper spray.
    Continue reading

  • Woman uses pepper spray to allegedly fight off attacker

    In Athens Ohio a Woman uses pepper spray to allegedly fight off attacker.

    PS-1sprayThe Ohio University Police Department is investigating an alleged rape in which a woman fought off a man by using pepper spray.

    Friday afternoon at 5:23 p.m., the police department was alerted by OhioHealth O'Bleness Hospital that a woman said she was raped by an unknown man on the Main Green on the campus of Ohio University on Tuesday, Nov. 11 at around 2 a.m.

    The woman reported that she noticed a group of men walking past her and then she was approached by one who tried to kiss her before holding her hands together and digitally penetrating her.

    She said she sprayed the man with pepper spray which caused the man and the others to flee.

    According to the police report, officials are not able to investigate further due to the anonymous nature of the report.

    Anyone with information that may help with the case is asked to contact OUPD at 593-1991.

  • Bear Spray Saves Man from Bear Attack

    The following article talks of how Bear Spray saved a Montana man from a bear attack.

    Continue reading

  • San Diego Woman Uses Pepper Spray to Defend Against Assailant

    SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A man grabbed a pedestrian on an Ocean Crest-area roadside early Friday and sexually assaulted her until she doused him with pepper spray and broke free, authorities reported.

    The attacker, who was dressed in dark clothing, including a zip-up hooded sweat shirt, jumped the victim as she was walking away from her car in the 4500 block of Riviera Shores Street shortly before 1:30 a.m., according to San Diego police.

    When she sprayed him with the Pepper Spray, he let her go and ran off, Sgt. Mike Holden said.

Items 1 to 10 of 105 total

Page:
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. ...
  7. 11